Statistical Deep Dive

4

 

 


I had planned to wait until after game 3 to do the first deep dive into the stats. That would be 10% of the season in the books. Since it's early and so much is unknown about these players and team, I think we'll knock one out and maybe do a couple more than I had planned. 

 

Legend: Minutes/PER/True Shooting/Box Plus Minus/ Offensive Rating/ Defensive Rating




MinPERTS%BPMORtgDRtg
Johnson3233.50.75911.5135.898.7
Pinedo825.60.702-2.7175.3105.1
Small6725.10.7165.8129.199.1
Felton6324.90.576.6129.688.9
LaCount3922.20.6722.5129.5103.3
Diboundje349.70.553-6112.6103.4
Ausar2380.438-7.7102.997.2
Sunderland87.8
-2077.7
Walker394.20.391-7.978.796.6
Bayela461.20.214-965.895.2
Kasanganay6-0.80-9.172.2108.9
Debaut22-2.40.253-16.44295
Tabbs11-22.90.167-36.429.9108

 

 

Obviously, it's a small sample size, but there is still knowledge that can be gleaned IMO.  It's pretty clear the handful of players that have driven the success so far and why ECU is 2-0 both in the eye test and by the stats.  It's been Johnson, Small, Felton, and LaCount. Of the 3, only Felton has under a .670 True Shooting, meaning he is doing other things on the court to drive his value to this point like getting steals and blocks mainly. 

 

Considering how low Felton's defensive stats were last year, averaging 3 steals and 1 block isn't likely as sustainable. (He had 10 seals and 2 blocks in 400+ minutes last year. He has 6 and 2 in 63 minutes this season) The kind of shooting and efficiency the other 3 have had to this point is unsustainable in the long run as well unless you are dunking everything or in the best three-point shooters in the nation.


There is the issue that all of these guys are likely to regress big time in what has driven the value of the first two wins. ECU is certainly going to need some other scorers to step up and shoot reasonable percentages over time when those drop or the defense will need to pick up. It's an unsustainable formula so far. ECU is also 33rd in threes made a game and 85th in percentage, and 15th out of 363 in Ken Pom's luck rating after 2 games.



Bryant beat a team D3 team by 108 points last week so there are lots of skewed craziness right now. Removing the non-D1 trash so we get a truer picture ECU's offense is 85th in the nation through 2 games. The Defense is 117th. I think there is little question the offense is going to come down a lot, but the defensive number seems attainable if Asur starts playing more. He was what drove the defense last game and ECU was +15 on the court.  So far from what I've seen and the numbers bear out.


This seems like the best 5 ECU that can put on the court based on early returns.

C Ausar

F Johnson

F Felton

G LaCount

G Small


 There has been a significant drop-off after that, but Diboundje I think is 6th. That's the 6 that seem to need the time and everyone else could fight for that 7th position where no one has distinguished themselves at this point.


The Pace has been pretty slow at #201, so far so if this keeps up there is no need to play 10 or 12 guys in the long run. Tennessee played slow as well last year too, so this seems like the range we are looking at. It was slower than ECU played even with much tighter rotations last season.  If only 4 or 5 players are playing well which is the case so far, they got to likely play a lot to have success when they play the better teams on the schedule. It's something to watch but these are the 5-6 guys I would expect to continue to be the stand-out players on the team. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tags

Post a Comment

4Comments
  1. You use the word unsustainable when it comes to the positive numbers but you aren’t acknowledging that the same could be said for some players who currently have trending negative numbers. Tabbs for example will probably get better as the season progresses not to mention some younger players such as Bayella, Walker etc.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I did say it's going to have to come from the other guys shooting better or the defense. If the first two games are any indication, they aren't really playing a lot or taking enough shots/usage to make up the difference. I expect the rotations get tighter when the teams get better too. Bayela is the one I expect to score a lot better who is also expected to play a lot. Even if Debaut plays he's barely shooting for example. It would have to be his defense or better overall team defense.

    I didn't have high hopes for Tabbs compared to most who I think put unreasonable expectations on him. He had a -18.2 net rating, 116 DRtg and BC was 2-10 with him on the court even before more injuries and time missed. There is a lot of rust. He's going to make more shots than he has but the evidence is bad on defense, and I doubt he plays more than 15 minutes on average if I had to guess. Getting Baylea going seems to be more the key to make up for what's going to regress from the main guy's IMO. I'd expect him to be better than he has. Walker and QD are about what I expect.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Definitely think the shooting is unsustainable. I do however think some of the defensive numbers like feltons could be for real. He is a good athlete and it's not physical tools holding him back. Our new coach is supposed to be a defensive guy. It's believable to me that some players would be improved on that end.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I mentioned he had the physical tools to be a better defender in the preview. Still, 3 steals and 1 block (for a guard) per game is elite stuff. I can't see him being anywhere that disruptive per game after last year. I think he could be a much better man-to-man defender with Schwartz's help but not turn guys over like that. Half that 3 and 1 would be more realistic goal IMO.

      Delete
Post a Comment